I just meant you won't be able to use the built-in auth.profile() 
functionality -- your example is custom code.

Anthony

On Monday, February 1, 2016 at 1:33:54 PM UTC-5, Ron Chatterjee wrote:
>
> Thank you Anthony,
>
> Very good discussion. Just one question regarding when you say we "have to 
> create own register/profile"...
>
> Let's say my model is:
>
>
> #----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> db.define_table("Education",
>                 Field("education_of", 'reference auth_user', 
> widget=SQLFORM.widgets.options.widget, requires= IS_EMPTY_OR(IS_IN_DB(db,
> db.auth_user.id))),
>                 Field("Title", "string", label='Education Title', 
> requires=IS_NOT_EMPTY(),default=None))
>
> #----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> controller:
>
>   form = auth();
>     form2 = SQLFORM(db.Education).process()
>     if form2.accepted:
>         db.Education.education_of.default = db.auth_user.id
>     return dict(form=form, form2 = form2)
>
>
> #-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> And in view we add the education as a folding or something:
>
> <div class="container">
>   <button type="button" class="btn btn-info" data-toggle="collapse" 
> data-target="#demo">Add Education</button>
>   <div id="demo" class="collapse">{{=form2}}</div>
> </div>
>     
>
> We can make the education_of  as readable = False. So, it gets 
> updated/inserted as auth_user.id
>
> Do I still need to code up profile separately?  We can add other tables 
> the same way. No?
>
>
> On Monday, February 1, 2016 at 12:25:43 PM UTC-5, Anthony wrote:
>>
>> If there aren't too many fields, it might just be easiest to put them all 
>> in auth_user and just make some conditionally readable/writable depending 
>> on the type of user. Otherwise, you could create separate profile tables 
>> and have them reference auth_user. In that case, you would have to create 
>> your own register/profile actions, as web2py Auth won't handle the separate 
>> tables for you.
>>
>> Finally, it might be possible for you to conditionally change the names 
>> of the Auth tables based on user type: 
>> http://web2py.com/books/default/chapter/29/09/access-control#Renaming-Auth-tables.
>>  
>> However, you would have to be able to identify the user type *prior* to 
>> registration/login (e.g., based on some identifier in the URL), as the Auth 
>> table names must be determined in order to process any Auth actions.
>>
>> Anthony
>>
>> On Monday, February 1, 2016 at 12:30:04 AM UTC-5, [email protected] 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello web2py community. I am a new user and I have to say, web2py saves 
>>> the day by saving so much time over a full stack framework which requires 
>>> so much work. Anyway, going to ask a question tothe community. How to 
>>> custom create auth_user so instead of adding extra fields to the auth_user 
>>> we can have multiple tables for the profile with various attributes. I am 
>>> creating an application for gym membership and I need to have the user 
>>> register based on their job, current address, prior fitness routines, 
>>> current fitness routine, activities they are interested...etc. Put all in 
>>> one tables with various fields seems make a table disproportionately long. 
>>> Would be nice to split them to different tables and user can pick and 
>>> choose which tables they like to fill up or they don't. 
>>>
>>

-- 
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to