I've seen the first link, but the project is really outdated. So I thought that wouldn't do the job anymore. I'll look into it again. And the second link is broken (404). :( But is fair to say that this part of the framework is weak or it need more attention?
On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 4:08:13 AM UTC-3, Matheus Cardoso wrote: > > What do you guys use as a "solution" to E2E tests? I think this is a weak > part of web2py. I know WebClient solution, but it's still uses the same > "db" defined in db.py and prevents me to use Selenium, for instance. Let me > give a example: in Django, one can write a test.py in an app, define some > TestCase classes and then run (*python manage.py test*) in a complete > separated "test environment", with separated test database, method's > isolation, etc. What is correspondent way in web2py? (sorry for the > comparison, but this is my daily routine, django in work and web2py to my > side jobs). > -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
