*nix --> nginx with uwsgi windows --> iis with fastcgi
On Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 8:01:22 PM UTC+1, Omi Chiba wrote: > > Thank you! I will stick to Apache/wsgi for now. > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 1:54:37 PM UTC-5, Jim S wrote: >> >> I think the thread you referenced was one discussing deployment on Ubuntu >> where yes, nginx/uwsgi is preferred. But, the Windows environment is >> different (in my opinion) since the Windows nginx is still considered >> 'beta'. I wouldn't feel that comfortable using it. (that said, I do use >> many other 'beta' projects) >> >> If Apache/mod_wsgi is really frowned upon, should it be noted in the book? >> >> @omi - I migrated from Windows/Apache/mod_wsgi a while back to >> Ubuntu/nginx/uwsgi. I think that at that time I switched from using pyodbc >> to pypyodbc. I too access MS SQL servers from my ubuntu box using ODBC >> (along with IBM AS/400 databases). It works very well for me. >> >> -Jim >> >> >> On Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 1:33:53 PM UTC-5, Richard wrote: >>> >>> I would say, we don't not don't support it, we just don't maintain a >>> web2py setup script with Apache... I think the decision was to reduce the >>> number of setup script to the bare minium to only the one web2py-devs are >>> willing to maintain... >>> >>> That been said, I am sure that if you or someone else take owner ship to >>> update and maintain Apache setup script because it important for you we >>> will bring it back in the scripts folder... But I wouldn't take that path >>> before someone demonstrate commitment to the task as we don't want to get >>> back stuff that will not be maintain in years in the repo... I guess you >>> can set your own github repo to demonstrate your commitment and help the >>> community though, and it could be reference somewhere appropriate in the >>> book. >>> >>> Richard >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Dave S <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 7:51:26 AM UTC-7, Omi Chiba wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Thank you. I thought the Massimo's comment below and he also >>>>> mentioned somewhere we don't want to support Apache anymore... that's why >>>>> I >>>>> was nervous. I was thinking to your direction (Moving to Ubuntu) but I >>>>> use >>>>> pyodbc to connect Microsoft SQL Server and DB2, also python-ldap.. so not >>>>> sure if it works the same way. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "P.S. I stand by Niphlod. He did not say anything offending and his >>>>> comment was insightful. We do not recommend apache+mod_wsgi because there >>>>> are better ways (nginx+uwsgi)." >>>>> >>>>> >>>> If you have a working Apache configuration, that's an argument for >>>> staying with it [caveats follow]. Part of the deprecating is because >>>> Apache configuration is delicate, complicated, and [reportedly] the >>>> documentation isn't always helpful. If you're beyond that stage, that's >>>> one objection overcome. The caveats: there is some concern that Apache >>>> security updates may be frequent and patching may be delicate and >>>> complicated [it's been around long enough that may have an "organic" >>>> structure]. >>>> >>>> I think Niphlod has run both IIS and nginx on Windows, and nginx on his >>>> linux systems, but I'd have to go back through his posts to be sure of >>>> that. >>>> >>>> /dps >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 9:39:17 AM UTC-5, Jim S wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I haven't seen anything about Apache no longer supported. Did I miss >>>>>> something? >>>>>> >>>>>> To my knowledge, nginx is not considered 'production ready' on >>>>>> Windows. See the first paragraph here: >>>>>> http://nginx.org/en/docs/windows.html >>>>>> >>>>>> I think Apache is the way to go. >>>>>> http://web2py.com/books/default/chapter/29/13/deployment-recipes#Apache-and-mod_wsgi >>>>>> >>>>>> For me though, I've moved all of my production servers to Ubuntu with >>>>>> nginx / uwsgi. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Jim >>>>>> >>>>>> On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 5:31:06 PM UTC-5, Omi Chiba wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm running production site with Apache but it sounds like we don't >>>>>>> support apache anymore... which is one is better/easy option for me? I >>>>>>> tried IIS long time ago but didn't success... maybe it was too >>>>>>> complicated >>>>>>> for me. >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>> Resources: >>>> - http://web2py.com >>>> - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) >>>> - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) >>>> - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "web2py-users" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
