:(

One part of my problem is something I introduce to compute the width of the
input field to set dynamically the field width... Is too slow even in case
I use itemgetter as explained here :

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13145368/find-the-maximum-value-in-a-list-of-tuples-in-python

So I guess I can't improve the display of the form select that way...

But even then I think at some point the number of record affect form time
load which compromise the use of lazy_option widget as the data set get
bigger and bigger...

Richard

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Richard Vézina <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello Anthony,
>
> I face some scaling issue with lazy_option plugin, but I am not sure I
> understand how the .join method you mention can help solve the issue...
>
> I also customize lazy_option...
>
> I think the main problem with lazy_option is that it load all the data
> present in the reference table, so once your database start to be large it
> start to take a lot of time initializing all these rows...
>
> I think the way to workaround that would be to add a "load more" feature
> to lazy_option...
>
> Also, I am not sure that lazy_option is not load only once the form/DOM is
> loaded once, mean it get lazy just once the DOM have been initialize once,
> so not that lazy...
>
> Richard
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'd say the first option is "lazy", as it defers the query until the data
>> are requested, but terminology aside, the DAL does not have built-in
>> functionality to handle the second option. Note, on the developers list,
>> Massimo has just proposed a .join method on Rows that would do something
>> similar, but with two queries instead of 3+. Alternatively, note that
>> .select() takes a "processor" argument, so I suppose you could implement a
>> custom processor that takes a query involving a join and instead of
>> returning the typical join result set returns a set of rows with nested
>> records.
>>
>> Anthony
>>
>>
>> On Monday, July 4, 2016 at 2:14:14 PM UTC-4, Carlos Cesar Caballero wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, some ORMs have a lazy option for reduce queries when we ask for
>>> references, for example, something like:
>>>
>>>
>>> rows = db(db.mytable.id > 0).select()
>>>
>>> relation_name1 = rows[0].id_relation.name
>>>
>>> relation_name2 = rows[1].id_relation.name
>>>
>>>
>>> Will generate 3 querys, but with the lazy option, something like:
>>>
>>>
>>> rows = db(db.mytable.id > 0).select(lazy=true)
>>>
>>> relation_name1 = rows[0].id_relation.name
>>>
>>> relation_name2 = rows[1].id_relation.name
>>>
>>>
>>> Will generate only one query, and in that way the DAL will make the
>>> joins in the query and populate the reference rows.
>>>
>>> Is posible do something like this with pyDAL?
>>>
>>> Greetings.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Este mensaje le ha llegado mediante el servicio de correo electronico
>>> que ofrece Infomed para respaldar el cumplimiento de las misiones del
>>> Sistema Nacional de Salud. La persona que envia este correo asume el
>>> compromiso de usar el servicio a tales fines y cumplir con las regulaciones
>>> establecidas
>>>
>>> Infomed: http://www.sld.cu/
>>>
>>> --
>> Resources:
>> - http://web2py.com
>> - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
>> - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
>> - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "web2py-users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to