>>I am not an expert, but since I found out about your web2py, I am speechless.
That was my reaction too. web2py was the only framework I found that let me focus on actual web development and not get bogged down by idiosyncratic templating languages and quirks of other people's imaginations. It's just a smarter framework. But as Massimo has said, web2py would not exist without it's predecessors. Turbogears, Django and others forged a path and web2py improved upon that path. I would not hesitate to use it for any size project. The limitations have more to do with dynamic vs. static language performance IMO. On Jul 7, 5:16 pm, eric cs <[email protected]> wrote: > Wow Massimo him self, that alone is awesome. > I am not an expert, but since I found out about your web2py, I am > speechless. > Looks like so good that must hava a flaw,,,hehehe, you know what I am > saying. > I bet more people know about it they will quit other frameworks. > How does it compare to java's spring and Php's zend in your opinion. > Congratulation for this fantastic piece of software. > I would like to help anywhere I can if you guys need some, I believe > 120% in web2py. > Just amazing!!!!! > Web2py will make me learn Python!!! > > On Jul 7, 6:04 pm, eric cs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Fran thanks for the reply, but about those problems how > > rails,zend,django would be diferent. > > I understand orm for big sites can be slow, but just that right? > > Thanks. > > > On Jul 7, 5:53 pm, Fran <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Jul 7, 10:36 pm, eric cs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I'm just wondering to do big e-commerce sites like > > > >www.taget.comorwww.bestbuy.comisn'tweb2pyenough, or does it need more > > > >maturity? > > > > I imagine that a serious site like this would have a team behind it > > > which may mean you wouldn't get all the benefits of Web2Py: > > > * DB folks may not let you do live migrations > > > * Web designers will need the full custom forms so will quickly move > > > beyond the rapid prototyping benefits of simple {{=form}} > > > * You'll have rigorous change control on upgrades to framework so > > > won't benefit from rapid codebase development > > > > Note this isn't a reason against Web2Py for such an application...just > > > that it's less of a sweet spot for this framework. > > > I see no reason why it would actually be a bad idea to use this > > > framework though - I imagine that you'll still be able to prototype > > > quickly & deliver a fully-working system just a bit later. > > > > Let us know how you get on :) > > > > F --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
