It's possible, but not if they're doing what yours are.

Namely the problem here is not that you have a before and after update 
callback. The problem is your __after_update_order. Your 
__after_update_order updates table *order* which triggers 
__after_update_order again. This would be ok if you had a condition that 
would terminate the recursion which you don't,  

Lets see what happens when s.update(notes='test') runs. This is an update 
where 'is_active' is not in *f* so it will trigger s.update(notes='test') 
again. And again. And again.  

-- 
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to