what about this?

auth.settings.registration_onaccept=lambda form: auth.is_logged_in()
or redirect(URL(r=request,f='login'))



On Jul 10, 7:51 pm, Jonathan Lundell <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jul 10, 2009, at 5:34 PM, mdipierro wrote:
>
> > I do not like the idea of a paremeter dependent on another parameter.
> > What do other people think?
> > I think people should propably override this variable anyway.
>
> The problem is that there's no way to override the variable(s) to get  
> the desired (by me, anyway, but I think it's logical) distinction  
> between being logged in or not.
>
> That's crucial, isn't it? Either the user is logged in and ready to  
> go, so we go to login_next (regardless of whether we got there via  
> login or registration-and-auto-login), or the user is not logged in  
> and we don't.
>
> The problem is that registration_next takes us to the same place  
> regardless of whether the registration resulted in a login or not.
>
> Perhaps there should be three nexts: login, registration+login,  
> registration+pending.
>
>
>
> > Massimo
>
> > On Jul 10, 7:10 pm, Jonathan Lundell <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On Jul 9, 2009, at 3:05 PM, mdipierro wrote:
>
> >>> You are right. Uploading your fix  to trunk. Thanks.
>
> >> There's a remaining problem, I think.
>
> >> The current behavior (after this patch) is to log in after
> >> registration and go to index. The problem is that (and I think that
> >> Fran brought this up), after registration you really want to go to
> >> login_next if you're logged in, but to registration_next if you're  
> >> not
> >> (which would be the case if you're using email verification).
>
> >> Making them both index fixes simple apps like welcome, because its
> >> login_next (index) doesn't really care if you're logged in. But if
> >> you've got (as I do) login_next that uses (say) auth.user.id, you'll
> >> get a ticket if you go there after a registration that doesn't do a
> >> login.
>
> >> I think the behavior should be: go to login_next after a successful
> >> login *or* after a registration that performs a successful login. Go
> >> to registration_next if the registration process went OK but for some
> >> reason (like email verification) the user isn't logged in.
>
> >> On a somewhat related matter: there ought to be a way to request the
> >> sending of another email verification. If the message gets lost for
> >> some reason, there's no way for the user to deal with it, excepting
> >> maybe trying to get some administrator's attention to manually edit
> >> the user table.
>
> >>> Massimo
>
> >>> On Jul 9, 4:09 pm, Jonathan Lundell <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> On Jul 9, 2009, at 1:48 PM, mdipierro wrote:
>
> >>>>> You should not ne already logged in after registration. That is  
> >>>>> not
> >>>>> default behaviour
>
> >>>> That's how welcome is working. This is immediately after  
> >>>> registering:
>
> >>>> pastedGraphic.tiff
> >>>> 57KViewDownload
>
> >>>>> On Jul 9, 3:11 pm, Jonathan Lundell <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>> From the pov of a novice...
>
> >>>>>> The default auth.settings.register_next (user/login) is confusing
> >>>>>> in
> >>>>>> that after registration you're already logged in, but user/
> >>>>>> login is
> >>>>>> asking for a login again. f=index might be a better choice.
>
> >>>>>> Yes, I know it's easy to override, but the confusion starts  
> >>>>>> with a
> >>>>>> new
> >>>>>> user playing with the welcome application.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to