I am not against sugary goodness in general, but this seems like something that might be better handled with education rather than overlaying the name "integer" with "reference genric". (Besides, then what would you do with people who wanted to use UUIDs for their "reference generics" instead of integers?)
I know -- I'll put a page in the web2py wiki about it! ;-P -- Joe B. On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Yarko Tymciurak <[email protected]> wrote: > yes - my point is this is not obvious, so effecting the same by adding the > syntax to accomplish the same would be [a] more obvious, and can be talked > about in the appropriate section of the manual, and [b] make the code more > readable, e.g.; > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
