yes, but it would be good if they officially supported/recognized web2py like they do Django, Turbogears, etc.
On Sep 9, 4:53 pm, Graham Dumpleton <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 9, 3:59 pm, Richard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > There are 2 threads in the WebFaction forum at the moment about > > getting better support for > > web2py:http://forum.webfaction.com/viewtopic.php?id=3184http://forum.webfact... > > > I know quite a few of us use WebFaction, so if you think it's a good > > idea add your voice to the thread. > > You do realise you don't have to wait for WebFaction to write a custom > installer for web2py, you could using their custom installer script > feature to write your own installer and host it on web2py site. If > people want to use it, they just need to point the custom installer > script option at the URL on web2py site and it will suck it down, let > you review it if you want and then run it. > > So, why wait for WebFaction. > > Graham --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
