On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:24 AM, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> The new mechanism only kicks in if you have SQLITE and the references
> are set as ondelete='CASCADE' (the default).
> If you try to access a non sqlite database nothing changes
> If you try to access an existing sqlite database, then set
> oncascade='' and migrate=False.
> I cannot think of a situation where this can create conflict.
>

If you have web2py doing "web2py cascade" on sqlite db named "a";
AND
you have (something else)  creating sqlite records, and does "cascade
triggers" in sqlite db named "a" (co-accessed by web2py &, say, django) then
you have trouble.

I suggest this be re-implemented to do cascade the way sqlite suggests.
(see http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=ForeignKeyTriggers )

>
> On Sep 11, 11:18 am, Yarko Tymciurak <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:42 AM, mdipierro <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sep 11, 1:19 am, Richard <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > on delete cascade in SQLite
> >
> > > > Fantastic! My feature request for this can be closed:
> > >http://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/detail?id=50
> >
> > > Can you do it or should I do it?
> >
> > > > Did the solution involve sqlite triggers?
> >
> > > No. The solution is quite dumb. recursively delete all referencing
> > > records. I guess it could be improved using triggers.
> >
> > Yes - I was going to mention this too when I saw it....   There is a
> pattern
> > on SQLite pages somewhere (I pointed someone to them once).
> >
> > My immediate concern is about web2py only activity taking care of an
> > external db - and what is another app is cooperating on the DB (like we
> are
> > doing for PyCon - either web2py or django...)...
> >
> > What is the db exists, and already has triggers to handle cascade?  What
> > happens then?
> > What is another application assumes / depends on the DB to have the
> tirggers
> > (so one - web2py - does the cascade action, but the other doesn't).
> >
> > Make sense?  I think this
> > needs more thought.
> >
> > - Yarko
> >
> >
> >
> > > > > row = db(db.mytable.id>0).select().first()
> >
> > > > very convenient
> >
> > > > Richard
> >
> > > > On Sep 11, 3:12 pm, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > I have made some changes to the code in trunk:
> >
> > > > > 1) Since tonight I attended a presentation about how SQLAlchemy can
> do
> > > > > on delete cascade in SQLite even if SQLite does not support it, I
> > > > > implemented this feature in web2py too. There is nothing you have
> to
> > > > > do it now there by default. For example:
> >
> > > > > db=DAL('sqlite://test.db')
> > > > > db.define_table('a',Field('name'))
> > > > >
> db.define_table('b',Field('a',db.a,ondelete='CASCADE'),Field('name'))
> > > > > db.a.insert(name='xxx1')
> > > > > db.a.insert(name='xxx2')
> > > > > db.a.insert(name='xxx3')
> > > > > db.a.insert(name='xxx4')
> > > > > db.b.insert(a=2,name='yyy1') #(1)
> > > > > db.b.insert(a=2,name='yyy2') #(1)
> > > > > db.b.insert(a=3,name='yyy3')
> > > > > db(db.a.id==2).delete()
> > > > > for row in db(db.b.a==2).select(): print row # prints nothing as it
> > > > > should
> >
> > > > > Notice ondelete='CASCADE' is default.
> >
> > > > > 2) you can now do:
> >
> > > > > row = db(db.mytable.id>0).select().first()
> > > > > row = db(db.mytable.id>0).select().last()
> >
> > > > > and row is None if no records are selected.
> >
> > > > > 3) I fixed the problem with the memory leak reported by zahariash
> >
> > > > > 4) I refactored some code in main.py, compileapp.py and globals.py.
> > > > > This should make the code cleaner. Hopefully I did not break it.
> > > > > Please give it a try.
> >
> > > > > Massimo
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to