I think the proposed system is minimally disruptive, programmers do not need to know anything about AJAX/JSON
That sounds very good. I watched the video and it looks very good! 2009/10/1 mdipierro <[email protected]> > > I just mean that if we want plugin components to return JSON instead > of using the proposed mechanism, than people programming plugins would > not be able to return a dict() and have it rendered by a view as they > are used to, we would have to create a new programming paradigm and > new functions (API) to deal with it. > > I think the proposed system is minimally disruptive, programmers do > not need to know anything about AJAX/JSON and I should be able to > handle it with a single new chapter in the book. ;-) > > Massimo > > On Oct 1, 10:03 am, Pynthon Pynthon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Maybe I did not understand the word API but that means you need to > rebuild > > everything? Or do you mean a new json API? > > > > Sorry :$. > > > > 2009/10/1 mdipierro <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > One rarely needs to return metadata (js/flash) with response and with > > > the proposed mechanism one would not need any special API to create a > > > plugin. If using json the response would have to be encoded in json > > > and this would require new api. > > > > > On Oct 1, 9:25 am, AndrewLoot <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Whats the benefit of using headers for inter-component communication > > > > why not pass a json object in with the response? > > > -- Please visit my blog pynthon.naar.info --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
