can you be more specific? There is no review process in place the likes of code review on google, and that would go a LONG way to our being able to take input from community, even let community review before proj. leads (e.g. Massimo) approve and merge into mainlines....
I don't think bitbucket is nearly as structured (more wiki-fied). On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Álvaro Justen [Turicas] < [email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 21:00, Yarko Tymciurak <[email protected]> wrote: > > also - bitbucket does not have the review system tied to the repository, > as > > Guido put in and has been implemented for google code - not to mention > the > > increased exposure to search for simply being, being reviewed on google. > > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:56 PM, mdipierro <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> why one over the other? pros, cons? > >> > >> bitbucket had some major downtime last week. > > I like BitBucket because it is like GitHub that have a great "social" > integration - I think it is very important for free software projects. > I don't see it so good in Google Code. > > -- > Álvaro Justen > Peta5 - Telecomunicações e Software Livre > 21 3021-6001 / 9898-0141 > http://www.peta5.com.br/ > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
