Secure is probably the wrong word - I mean handing over your work and allowing someone to steal it.
I was thinking the entire point was to ONLY use Skulpt, not as you would javascript. That makes more sense. On Oct 12, 11:28 am, Thadeus Burgess <[email protected]> wrote: > Personally, I have tried using pyjamas, and seriously considered it for my > webapp at work, however I don't like how massively clunky it is, and how it > has its "compile qwerks". Maybe I was just doing it all wrong, but It just > didn't seem streamlined enough for my purposes. > > jquery + jqueryui and the likes seems to be a much better solution at this > point in time. > > I think the point of skulpt is to provide Javascript, written with python > syntax. Basically, you're still doing the same exact thing that you would be > using javascript (in fact it gets compiled to js and ran), but your writing > it in python, so you don't have to learn another syntax. > > Javascript gets downloaded to every visitor, do you think thats insecure? > > -Thadeus > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Michael - afewtips.com > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > So all of my code would be downloaded to every visitor? > > Seems a little insecure if nothing else. > > > On Oct 12, 2:40 am, Thadeus Burgess <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It's python, with a javascript compiler! So you can write python client > > side > > > code. > > > > I just thought this was a very interesting project and wanted to share > > it. > > > >http://www.skulpt.org/ > > > > -Thadeus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
