On Dec 4, 11:56 am, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote:
> While I not against the move.
> Actually I like the current mechanism for people emailing me patches.
> Using a web based system will actually turn out to be more work.

That doesn't need to be true; for example, Chromium (open source
Chrome) project uses this, and requires
code reviews first.

Right now, only you do "code reviews" - what is missing is community
eyes, and more discussion;  openness (the point of open source!) will
over time improve the codebase.

The way the Android open source project works (although that's manged
by git), no person is given a checkin: rather, a "component" is
assigned to codereview, which is the only thing allowed to commit (a
service) - and it does so by following a review and approval by one or
more of the component "admins" (owners), and then goes to commit and
runs thru tests. After tests pass, then someone does integtration.

The appropriate role for you would be to divest yourself of parts, and
oversee integration (approve or dissaprove there).

This could be no more work (different) than current, but would allow a
different kind of progress.

Change is hard; change is good! ;-)


>
> Massimo
>
> On Dec 4, 11:42 am, Thadeus Burgess <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > As long as this community is growing, we really need to move to a
> > DVCS. Instead of contributors having to mail you diffs, you could just
> > choose to "pull" from our cloned repositories, and pick out what you
> > want... At any time.
>
> > -Thadeus
>
> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:16 AM, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> I suggest that web2py will improve by updating it to create missing
> > >> empty application directories.
>
> > > It does that already. It just needs testing (check in everything with
> > > hg, delete everything, checkout everything. Does it work?)
>
> > >> You are correct - I guessed; here is what DOES work:
>
> > >>    syntax: regexp
> > >>    ^(?!README$)
>
> > > Thanks Yarko. Hopefully we do not need it if we take the approach that
> > > web2py creates the missing folder.
>
> > >> > 2) the security model (it assigns me a password instead of letting me
> > >> > register a public key as in launchpad).
>
> > >> Not sure what you are talking about here (hg does not assign you a
> > >> password; is this something google code is doing? what happens if you
> > >> use an SSL connection, e.g. https://.....  ?)
>
> > > It is something that google code does.
>
> > > --
>
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > > "web2py-users" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > > [email protected].
> > > For more options, visit this group 
> > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.


Reply via email to