This is the most recurrent topic I think. It should be called
"Decoupled, Custom and Tableless Forms". I'd say it would involve lot of
changes for "default" things that web2py does now very well, and that is
the problem.
Alex F
El 06/01/2010 0:13, Thadeus Burgess escribió:
I think what he really wants is the same thing I have been discussing
for quite a while :)
For now, sqlform.custom is the way to go
http://web2py.com/AlterEgo/default/show/205
-Thadeus
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:25 PM, mdipierro<[email protected]> wrote:
I think this should do it:
form=SQLFORM(...)
form.components=[row[1][0] for row in form[0].components]
You can try variations
On Jan 5, 4:18 pm, Alexandre<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I would like to get SQLFORM without tables, just one field on top of the
other, is that possible?
It would be nice if instead of a table, we could iterate through the fields
in SQLFORM, so that we could represent it anyway we would like.
Thanks,
Alexandre Rosenfeld
Eng Comp 06 - USP São Carlos
FoG -http://fog.icmc.usp.br
IM Team - AIESEC
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
--
Alejandro Fanjul Fdez.
[email protected]
www.mhproject.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
