On Feb 8, 5:02 am, kralin <[email protected]> wrote: > well, a primary key is always a good thing in a table, but > not everybody seems to use it, particularly in many to many tables. > > while this is not in the web2py specifications( by not requiring a > unique autoincremental id), > being able to read and write form this tables, can be very very useful > for legacy db support. I agree completely. Previously I was just pointing out that the current legacy support was designed to work with keyed tables only. Keyless table support would be a welcome addition. > I know that a something like crud cannot work in this tables since you > are not guaranteed to > select a single entry, but making it work at a lower level can be > useful... > It might be the case, I just have not thought about it.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
