On Feb 8, 2010, at 2:46 AM, Beerc wrote: > I ***LOVE*** the tight integration of web2py components. > > I ***LOVE*** the compactness of web2py.
These are by far the two biggest reasons I started using web2py, mainly over Django and its kin. Now that I have a little more experience, I'd add this mailing list to my list of reasons. My biggest complaint is what has been referred to as "magic" behavior, and in particular the relative opaqueness of some of that magic. Documentation could help there by making more clear what's going on inside; there's a little too much "do this and it just works" right now. But that's true of (say) RoR, too, so web2py isn't alone. I like the idea of a wiki that parallels the structure of the book. I'd also like to see a page each for all (or at least the important) classes, linked to their mentions in the mainline docs, where among other things magic behavior is explained. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
