On Feb 8, 2010, at 3:28 PM, Brian M wrote: > Insisting on having to use web2py for the documentation is silly. > Sorry, but there are a bunch of wikis out there that are better/more > complete than the one in web2py. Yeah we can try to built the perfect > wiki in web2py but waiting to do the community documentation until > that happens is a waste. Wiki syntax is pretty standard, when the day > comes to move to a web2py powered wiki the content can be migrated, > but in the mean time I say put something out there with MoinMoin or > DokuWiki or whatever and start getting some quality content. > Credibility wise I should think that having what's preceived as "poor" > documentation is worse than having good documentation that just > happens to not be powered by the framework being documented. I think > people will understand that the best tool for the job that was > currently available was used.
I think that's right. I'm not a fan of DokuWiki. I prefer MediaWiki, but it looks like MoinMoin is pretty similar in syntax. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
