I am not convinced. The current approach is easier for new user and
people with no MVC experience. Everybody else it probably using a
shell and emacs.

Anyway. Nothing prevents users from creating another admin interface.
It is just an app.

If it works we can incorporate in the official admin.


On Feb 19, 10:59 am, Thadeus Burgess <[email protected]> wrote:
> :)
>
> An IDE like approach would make the web editor much more appealing, if
> we had a list of files in a tree structure (using jquery tree) instead
> of having to constantly click back/forward to change files, or have a
> firefox tab open for each file you want to edit.
>
> -Thadeus
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Timothy Farrell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Not if you like Python.
>
> > On 2/18/2010 6:59 PM, Thadeus Burgess wrote:
>
> >>http://www.coderun.com/
>
> >> -Thadeus
>
> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Timothy Farrell<[email protected]>
> >>  wrote:
>
> >>> kodingen uses Bespin at its core.  Try using it in IE and you get this:
>
> >>>http://kodingen.com/_browsehappy.html
>
> >>> On 2/17/2010 1:07 AM, mdipierro wrote:
>
> >>>> This is a cool layout and editor. It uses jquery. no syntax
> >>>> highlighting.
>
> >>>> On Feb 17, 12:49 am, Thadeus Burgess<[email protected]>    wrote:
>
> >>>>>http://kodingen.com/
>
> >>>>> ?? this seems more along the lines.
>
> >>>>> -Thadeus
>
> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:29 PM, mikech<[email protected]>    wrote:
>
> >>>>>> To quote a saying:
> >>>>>> Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
>
> >>>>>> On Feb 16, 6:48 am, mdipierro<[email protected]>    wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> sorry was a joke and I did not mean it in a negative ways. I meant to
> >>>>>>> indicate that if before we were taking inspirations from them now
> >>>>>>> thay
> >>>>>>> are taking inspirations from us. I think that is a nice project and
> >>>>>>> perhaps we can learn from it too.
>
> >>>>>>> On Feb 16, 3:25 am, pistacchio<[email protected]>    wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> hi massimo,
> >>>>>>>> i really appreciate your work on web2py. the product is excellent,
> >>>>>>>> i've just launched my first site using it and other two are on the
> >>>>>>>> work. i like the new documentation (how it's shaping up) and the way
> >>>>>>>> you "rule" the community around web2py prove that your way is right.
> >>>>>>>> i
> >>>>>>>> mean, you do a lot of work and coordinate inputs.
>
> >>>>>>>> one thing i really don't understand is your approach to the
> >>>>>>>> opensource
> >>>>>>>> philosophy. i already pointed it out weeks ago about the non free,
> >>>>>>>> pdf
> >>>>>>>> documentation that is something really sick in a opensource
> >>>>>>>> environment. fortunately i was not the only one thinking this way
> >>>>>>>> and,
> >>>>>>>> in the end, the online book is now there and shining.
>
> >>>>>>>> now, i think this "copying us" is utterly out of place. as you
> >>>>>>>> stated
> >>>>>>>> somewhere, your sources of inspiration were initially django and
> >>>>>>>> rails. are you copying them? did you make the idea of "web
> >>>>>>>> framework"
> >>>>>>>> by yourself? were you the first one to come out with the mvc
> >>>>>>>> pattern?
> >>>>>>>> i don't think so, and this is perfect.
>
> >>>>>>>> the opensource community, seen as a whole, not as a series of rival
> >>>>>>>> smaller communities that gather around isolated projects, drains its
> >>>>>>>> power from the openness of the ideas, from making them circulate and
> >>>>>>>> the word "copy", with the negative connotation of "plagiarize"
> >>>>>>>> hidden
> >>>>>>>> within it, has nothing to do with this.
> >>>>>>>> the guy may or may be not been inspired by web2py, but if he was, it
> >>>>>>>> is a good thing that web2py did something so valid that other people
> >>>>>>>> want to take inspiration from it. if he ends up writing a piece of
> >>>>>>>> software that is better than the current web2py's online editor, we
> >>>>>>>> can replace it with the new, better one and the circle will be
> >>>>>>>> completed as opening an idea would lead to end up with a better
> >>>>>>>> product. that's the whole point of opensource.
>
> >>>>>>>> On Feb 16, 5:57 am, mdipierro<[email protected]>    wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>http://haineault.com/blog/125/
>
> >>>>>>>>> P.S. Of course we have 3 years of head start and the web2py
> >>>>>>>>> architecture was designed for this, theirs isn't.
>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>>>> Groups "web2py-users" group.
> >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>>>> [email protected].
> >>>>>> For more options, visit this group
> >>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >>> "web2py-users" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> [email protected].
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "web2py-users" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.

Reply via email to