On Mar 8, 6:37 am, villas <[email protected]> wrote: > Yarko, on reflection my post was not so clear, it is true. However, > IMO the central point here should be about rudeness rather than > clarity.
I appreciate this move on your part towards civility - ultimately, we can only be responsible for nothing more than how _we_ ourselves behave. The central point here, I suggest, is about web2py topics. From where I stood (and this is not to blame someone - it is how we humans tend to be) what one might call rudeness came from more than one place - and I can unequivocably say that name-calling, trying to change someone elses behavior is in this camp (i.e. "rude", at least by a dictionary definition of "being rough"). > You imply that it is correct to be rude about something > misunderstood, but I think you are wrong about that. I think rude has many cultural connotations, and what one finds rude, another would not - however, owning your own behavior, refraining from name-calling universally has impacts to which I always feel confident in responding to. > In any case, whether you are wrong or not, please accept my apologies > for any disquiet I have caused you :-) I appreciate your gesture. My disquiet is revolved around preserving the sense of community in a ... well... community. > Best wishes, > -David To civility! /*raises glass high*/ Kind regards, Yarko -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
