I am using Cherokee + uWSGI, couldn't be happier... only reason for not using nginx is I do love cherokee's web interface for configuration.
-Thadeus On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:04 PM, mr.freeze <[email protected]> wrote: > I wonder how Passenger WSGI compares? I'm running web2pyslices.com > with it but might move to uWSGI if there is a significant reason. Any > opinions? > > On Mar 16, 9:36 pm, Alex Fanjul <[email protected]> wrote: >> uWSGI is the clear winner by far... >> >> I think the winner mix is uWSGI + NGINX >> >> http://blog.zacharyvoase.com/2010-03-05-deployment-with-uwsgi-and-nginx >> >> El 17/03/2010 2:58, waTR escribi : >> >> >http://nichol.as/benchmark-of-python-web-servers >> >> -- >> Alejandro Fanjul Fdez. >> [email protected] > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "web2py-users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
