ab -n 10000 -c 1000 -k http://localhost/
If your website is slow, Rocket will only speed it up if you have lots concurrent connections. -tim -----Original Message----- From: "Michael Toomim" <too...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 5:32pm To: "web2py-users" <web2py@googlegroups.com> Subject: [web2py] Re: no more cherrypy wsgiserver Did you do anything special to use apachebench on the cherrypy server? When I run "ab http://localhost/init/"; I get a "apr_socket_recv: Connection refused (111)" error from apachebench. If I do the same command when running the latest hg tip of web2py (with rocket), the benchmark works. I'm trying to see if rocket will speed up my website. On Mar 12, 9:13 am, Timothy Farrell <tfarr...@swgen.com> wrote: > The benchmarks are in. As you can see from the attached PDF, there is a > strong case for Rocket. > > How I conducted these benchmarks: > > CPU: Athlon 4050e 2.1 GHz > RAM: 3GB > OS: Windows 7 Ultimate > Python 2.6.1 > Rocket 0.3.1 > Cherrypy 3.1.2 > > I used ApacheBench to run the numbers you see. > > The wsgi app used was as basic as it gets: > > def test_app(env, start_response): > start_response('200 OK', > [('Content-Type', 'text/plain')]) > return ["True"] > > Apache (and mod_wsgi) were not particularly tuned but were included to > show generally where it would end up on scales. Don't take this as a > definitive look at Apache or mod_wsgi's performance (back you > nginx/cherokee/lighty trolls! ;-). This is about a server that can be > included in web2py. > > You'll notice some blank entries in the numbers...here's why: > > My original intervals were 1,2,5,10,25,50,100,250,500,1000. However, I > added in 6,7,8 after seeing Cherrypy's performance hit a wall. I wanted > to show where that happened. I didn't see it necessary to include > Rocket or mod_wsgi in those iterations since they saw no such wall. > mod_wsgi does not include numbers for 500 or 1000 concurrent connections > because at that point Apache started rejecting connections. This would > not be an issue on a properly configured Apache. Once again, the main > comparison here is between Rocket and Cherrypy's wsgiserver. > > If you would like the full spreadsheet, email me privately. > > -tim > > On 3/11/2010 10:19 AM, Timothy Farrell wrote: > > > > > The code has changed since version 0.1, Let me re-run some > > benchmarks. I'll have time to tomorrow. > > > For those curious, the basic difference is that Rocket handles a few > > concurrent connections as fast as wsgiserver and many concurrent > > connections much much faster. It's also smaller, with cleaner code. > > > -tim > > > On 3/11/2010 10:08 AM, mdipierro wrote: > >> We moved from cherrypy wsgiserver to Rocket, by Timothy Farrell. > > >> I included an older version, need to include the latest one. > > >> It needs to be tested but let's wait I post the latest version before > >> we do so. > > >> Why? > >> @Tim, you made a very convincing case to me some time ago. Can you > >> share your benchmark with the rest of the users? > > >> Massimo > > Rocket Benchmarks.pdf > 10KViewDownload -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
