So then the question is whether the has_membership(...), add_group(...) etc. functionality can be extended to support multiple group tables, since such built-in functionality is so darn useful?
On Mar 18, 10:54 am, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote: > I see. than you probably want two tables. > > On Mar 18, 9:48 am, weheh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > OK. As a matter of fact, I've already done that, Massimo. The issue > > that I'm facing is a semantic one. > > > auth_group now stands for 2 things. In one case, it's roles for > > administrators and other users. In another case, it stands for a CIG. > > So let's say a CIG has a physical address and telephone number. > > Whereas, the role, CIG Admin, has neither, since the CIG Admin has an > > auth_user.id and auth_user is where user address and telephone number > > are stored. Do you understand the issue I'm getting at? It seems like > > I'm using auth_group for 2 very different purposes, doesn't it? This > > confuses me from a structural viewpoint.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
