But Thadeus, NoSQL is much more than moving away from SQL. It's not that we *want* joins to become an application's task, or that we want to remove consistency within requests. The driving forces are in general scalability, availability, & robustness with enormous amounts of traffic. For most sites good old SQL is pretty good. And there are some great ORMs to run on top of them. There will be many who follow the siren call of NoSQL who in retrospect could have done fine with MySQL/PostgresQL/ZODB. That will be next year's story. --r.
On May 21, 2010, at 9:31 AM, Thadeus Burgess wrote: > > If I am going to mess with relationships such as this I might as well > use a.... umm... relational database system ? > > -- > Thadeus > > > > > > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Albert Abril <[email protected]> wrote: >> Haha! I enjoy with this jokes in tech slides, they're amusing! >> >> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Timothy Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Developers running with scissors!! LOL!!! >>> >>> On 5/20/2010 2:12 PM, szimszon wrote: >>>> >>>> Nice >>>> >>>> On máj. 20, 19:52, mdipierro<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/31669670/PostgreSQL-and-NoSQL >>>>> >>> >> >> Russ Ferriday - Topia Systems - Open Source content management with Plone and Zope [email protected] - mobile: +1 805 234 6915 - skype: ferriday
