FYI - for year (years?) www.web2py.com ran on just cherrypy --- it had one problem with download streaming of large files on only some browsers (e.g. downloads of web2py archives would be incomplete). I think cherrypy folks my have fixed that.
In anycase, there is precedence for using it for hosting "light" use sites. On Jun 21, 8:25 pm, Álvaro Justen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 17:44, Giuseppe Luca Scrofani > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, as I wrote in another thread Im installing web2py on vps.net and I > > have some problem, maybe with apache... I dont know, I hope someone > > answer while I serch some info. But now my question is, I read in > > manual the included wsgi server in web2py it is not intended for > > production use due to lack of configurability. But this for a small > > site make sense? This is not a provocative question, is simply a > > question by a noob. I will be more than happy to use web2py as I used > > it on my computer: with simplicity. > > There are very serious problems in this approach? Security maybe? > > Hello Giuseppe, > I have one instance of web2py running with built-in server (it is now > Rocket - the book is not updated) and with varnish[1] has its frontend > (proxy/cache). But for now it does not have a lot of users. > I don't know about Rocket, but if you want to run web2py with > CherryPy, maybe you can ask in CherryPy's mail list or search in its > site[2] about use on production. > > [1]http://varnish-cache.org/ > [2]http://www.cherrypy.org/ > > -- > Álvaro Justen - Turicas > http://blog.justen.eng.br/ > 21 9898-0141
