Yes, I see it, thanks. I really do not like this format for a
reference manual. Just a personal preference. Sorry.

I do like the PHP index and cross linking, and I do think there are
some good ideas there, but I think a Reference Manual should be less
of a forum and more documentation oriented. In particular, I'm looking
to get away from a linear narrative and go to a very high-density
highly-cross-linked source of information.


On Jul 12, 2:45 am, Bruno Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:
> Look what i am talking about, in action 
> ->http://www.pyforum.org/pyforum/default/view_topic/507
>
> 2010/7/12 Bruno Rocha <[email protected]>
>
>
>
>
>
> > PHP manual is great, I always use, the information are easy to find, and
> > connections with related subjects are simple, one advantage is that it was
> > written in a way that allows various applications, badges, widgets etc using
> > your content
>
> > I think that information in the PHP manual is organized much like a forum,
> > the first post is a detailed explanation, with some examples. <
> >http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.operators.php> The replies below
> > are more examples of different scenarios for the same explained function.
>
> > With a good moderation, preventing unnecessary comments for each thread,
> > PyForumhttp://www.pyforum.org/could be a great start, may be, changing
> > PyForum to accept Markmin, and a good way for publish live demo examples.
>
> > Simply gather a team, and start writing, in this way each person moderates
> > others.
>
> > 2010/7/12 mdipierro <[email protected]>
>
> > This issue issue comes up regularly and my answer does not change.
>
> >> I very much welcome a community effort to have a better documentation.
> >> It was attempted many times before and many times it has failed. It
> >> failed because people think it is a technological issue (which wiki do
> >> we use?) but it is not. The problem is keeping the docs in sync with
> >> code is a pedantic issue and there is not enough motivation.
>
> >> The problem with the book is that content is copyrighted and I have an
> >> agreement with the publisher. I have already lost $600/month in
> >> revenues from book sales since the book was posted online. This has
> >> not been bade up by donations.
>
> >> I am in the process of revising the online book online:
> >> - add new sections
> >> - move from markdown to markmin
> >> - include an automatic markmin to pdf (for download)
> >> - make it more friendly to users
>
> >> As far as I am concerned I need help with docstings, examples in
> >> docstrigns, and more tests.
>
> >> I will look into the php wiki you refer to.
>
> >> Massimo
>
> >> > Massimo, do you think 5M pageviews would be exceeded in any month for
> >> > the time being?
>
> >> > ra3don: I like your idea of a download version. If we pack all into
> >> > a .w2p then the downloadable reference manual would be implemented.
> >> > Then you could install it on your local machine and access it later,
> >> > even if you didn't have an internet connection. Great for coding while
> >> > traveling!
>
> >> > Massimo, is the cube2py wiki ready to take on this task on GAE? If
> >> > yes, I say we get on with it. We'd need volunteers to setup and
> >> > administer.
>
> >> > Once set up, the first order of business would be to develop (wiki
> >> > pages, of course) a style guide for the various types of pages in the
> >> > Reference Manual. The pages I can think of three types of pages off
> >> > the top of my head:
>
> >> > Index pages
> >> >   - organized alphabetically by function
> >> >   - organized alphabetically by parameter/attribute (non-statement)
> >> > Manual page for web2py function
> >> > Manual page for web2py parameter/attributes
>
> > --
>
> >http://rochacbruno.com.br
>
> --
>
> http://rochacbruno.com.br- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to