On 11 August 2010 16:31, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote:

> It is typical. It can be reduced. Somewhere there was a thread about
> it.
>
>
Is this the one you are referring to -
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg35056.html?

If web2py is not being run in admin or development mode, will the memory
requirements be much better, or even running development with a third-party
web server, like nginx or lighttpd?



> On Aug 11, 9:59 am, Frank Church <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 11 August 2010 15:38, Thadeus Burgess <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > There is the ability to reduce memory usage however. Web2py likes to
> > > call the import_all module when it first loads up. This basically
> > > imports every web2py module so they are loaded into the python
> > > interpreter. That means when your code actually imports anything from
> > > gluon, the web server won't have to devote the resources to actually
> > > importing that module when a client requests a page. If you comment
> > > out the calls to the import_all module, it will reduce the initial
> > > memory usage.
> >
> > Sorry I mean't Mb, 126M, and it doesn't look right to me
> >
> > I run it by using ./web2py.py.
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> > > Thadeus
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Thadeus Burgess <
> [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Thats less than a MB. I don't see why you are complaining =P
> >
> > > > Typically my web2py instances all run around 75MB, with a max of
> 150MB
> > > > under heavy traffic load.
> >
> > > > It also depends on how much your caching or how big your select
> queries
> > > are.
> >
> > > > --
> > > > Thadeus
> >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Frank Church <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> I just started web2py on Linux, using the web2py.py command and
> memory
> > > used
> > > >> by the process is already 126K.
> >
> > > >> What is wrong, how can it be reduced?
> >
> > > >> --
> > > >> Frank Church
> >
> > > >> =======================
> > > >>http://devblog.brahmancreations.com
> >
> > --
> > Frank Church
> >
> > =======================http://devblog.brahmancreations.com
>



-- 
Frank Church

=======================
http://devblog.brahmancreations.com

Reply via email to