I just tried to bechmark standard web2py examples on the same machine. This example /examples/simple_examples/hello3.html gives me 70 req/sec and it also returns almost 7kB of page data.
and /examples/form_examples/form gives me 25 req/sec but with 30% of fail requests and this returns of 25kB of data, so its very nice. (I have reporetd this previously .. its strange that pages woth forms causes failed requests) David On 12 srp, 17:13, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems that it takes 600ms to serve a page when you are serving 10 > at the time. Considering that Python because of the GIL probably not > taking advantage of multiple cores you may have this is an effective > time per request of 600/10=60ms. I still think it is too high > considering you have a fast CPU. Can you check memory and cpu usage > wit top? Do you have many model files? What is in there? What is the > apache configuration (processes or threads)? > > Massimo > > On Aug 12, 10:05 am, David Marko <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > This is what I can see in log. The first two lines are when served > > just one request = simple page reload. The rest is with apache > > benchmark with concurrency set to 10. > > > 192.168.2.62, 2010-08-12 19:00:35, GET, /init/default/index, HTTP/1.0, > > 200, 0.082553 > > 192.168.2.62, 2010-08-12 19:01:02, GET, /init/default/index, HTTP/1.0, > > 200, 0.086724 > > > 192.168.2.62, 2010-08-12 19:01:31, GET, /init/default/index, HTTP/1.0, > > 200, 0.504790 > > 192.168.2.62, 2010-08-12 19:01:31, GET, /init/default/index, HTTP/1.0, > > 200, 0.506875 > > 192.168.2.62, 2010-08-12 19:01:31, GET, /init/default/index, HTTP/1.0, > > 200, 0.516474 > > 192.168.2.62, 2010-08-12 19:01:31, GET, /init/default/index, HTTP/1.0, > > 200, 0.599019 > > 192.168.2.62, 2010-08-12 19:01:31, GET, /init/default/index, HTTP/1.0, > > 200, 0.597636 > > 192.168.2.62, 2010-08-12 19:01:31, GET, /init/default/index, HTTP/1.0, > > 200, 0.622482 > > 192.168.2.62, 2010-08-12 19:01:31, GET, /init/default/index, HTTP/1.0, > > 200, 0.629780 > > 192.168.2.62, 2010-08-12 19:01:31, GET, /init/default/index, HTTP/1.0, > > 200, 0.660393 > > 192.168.2.62, 2010-08-12 19:01:31, GET, /init/default/index, HTTP/1.0, > > 200, 0.677426 > > 192.168.2.62, 2010-08-12 19:01:31, GET, /init/default/index, HTTP/1.0, > > 200, 0.712054 > > > On 12 srp, 16:56, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Here are the logs for my web server running web2py.com. The log only > > > shows dynamic pages most of which (like the book) use db. > > > >http://web2py.com/examples/static/logs.txt > > > > Most pages take around ~20ms but this is a 600MHz VPS with 384MB Ram. > > > > On Aug 12, 9:48 am, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Something is wrong. In wsgiserver.py set > > > > > LOGGING = True > > > > > and look at web2py/httpserver.log > > > > what times do you get? > > > > do you have very large model files? > > > > > Massimo > > > > > On Aug 12, 9:43 am, David Marko <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I just moved my first real-life app into production (its a private app > > > > > so I cant share screens etc.). Its running latest stable web2py on > > > > > Debian 5 + Python 2.6.5 + modwsgi 3.3 . When testing application home > > > > > page, where are no sql commands, session is disabled (by > > > > > session.forget()) and migration is disabled, I can get, using apache > > > > > benchmark, only 12 req/sec. When I compile app, it increases up to 16 > > > > > req/sec, but both numbers seems to me very low. Can you share some > > > > > your experience what one can get from web2py? > > > > > > Using browser, the application feels very responsive, but I'm just > > > > > scared (a bit) how this will change when all users start using the > > > > > app. > > > > > > My server HW is one processor 3GHz, 1.5 GB RAM. > > > > > > David
