You are the man. For the page I am considering the fail requests are not a real failure but declare a content-length of 19383 (wrong) instead of 19384 (correct). Let's continue investigate...
Massimo On Aug 12, 11:53 am, Jonathan Lundell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Aug 12, 2010, at 8:44 AM, David Marko wrote: > > > Failed requests: 19 > > (Connect: 0, Receive: 0, Length: 19, Exceptions: 0) > > Even more reassurance: > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1512304/failed-requests-by-length-... > > http://alwaysthecritic.typepad.com/atc/2009/04/apache-bench-notes.html > > The length variation should be checked, of course, but it may well be > harmless. > > If the length variation is under our control (cookie format, maybe?), perhaps > we could make an effort to make it the same.
