I do not recommend anyone to actually use this. This is just horrible.

> If I only need many2many in one directions I use the list:reference
> and I cache the query that maps the id into the representation of the
> corresponding record.

Then why are you not using the database types that are actually
designed for this? ARRAY comes to mind.

--
Thadeus





On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:42 PM, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote:
> True but joins are expensive.
>

>
> Massimo
>
> On Aug 12, 11:10 am, Thadeus Burgess <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ew
>>
>> jaywalking should never be a replacement for joins...
>>
>> --
>> Thadeus
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:42 AM, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Yes, if you use any validator IS_IN_SET or IS_IN_DB with
>> > multiple=True
>>
>> > I think it is still very convenient and can simplify some of your
>> > code. Yet on RDBS you can do joins and this should be used a
>> > replacement for that.
>>
>> > On Aug 11, 9:51 pm, Jason Brower <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> Should i worry about this on my setups with sqlite but i do not use gae?
>> >> Almost all my setups are sqlite but on apachi fcgi.
>> >> Best regards,
>> >> jason
>>
>> >> ----- Original message -----
>> >> > There was a problem with this which is now fixed.
>> >> > This is a very important feature if you plan to develop locally
>> >> > (sqlite) and deploy on GAE.
>>
>> >> > Massimo
>>
>> >> > On Aug 10, 4:18 am, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > > Experimentally there is a new feature in trunk.
>>
>> >> > > Field('name','list:string')
>> >> > > Field('name','list:integer')
>> >> > > Field('name','list:reference other table')
>>
>> >> > > and new operators
>>
>> >> > > db.mytable.myfield.contains(4)
>>
>> >> > > which works for list:reference, list:integer, list:string, string and
>> >> > > text types.
>>
>> >> > > The list: type are mapped differently on RDBS ([1,2,3]->'|1|2|3|') and
>> >> > > on GAE (uses a string list propery). It is backward compatible with
>> >> > > data stored using the IS_IN_DB(...,multiple=True). So here is an
>> >> > > example of a program:
>>
>> >> > > # model
>> >> > > db.define_table('product',Field('name'),format='%(name)s')
>> >> > > db.define_table('purchase',Field('code'),Field('products','list:reference
>> >> > > product'))
>>
>> >> > > # controller
>> >> > > def products():
>> >> > >      db.product.id.represent=lambda id: A('click
>> >> > > me',_href=URL('purchases_by_product',args=id))
>> >> > >      return
>> >> > > dict(form=crud.create(db.product),items=db(db.product.id>0).select())
>> >> > > def purchases():
>> >> > >      return
>> >> > > dict(form=crud.create(db.purchase),items=db(db.purchase.id>0).select())
>> >> > > def purchases_by_product():
>> >> > >      product_id=request.args(0)
>> >> > >      return
>> >> > > dict(items=db(db.purchase.products.contains(product_id)).select())
>>
>> >> > > Now register some products. When you try register purchases you should
>> >> > > automatically get a SELECT window with product names. The list of
>> >> > > items should also show a comma separated list of product names.
>>
>> >> > > I have not tested this on GAE. I could use some tests. Please let me
>> >> > > know.
>>
>> >> > > Massimo
>

Reply via email to