OK! Finally I get it to work properly...
For the misunderstanding, my poor english and the lack of time should be to blame... You were also talking of experimental feature... Anyway, what is important is that this feature is here to stay. Thank you for your help, it is truly appreciate. Regards Richard 2010/9/7 mdipierro <[email protected]> > Unless I misunderstood his comment, "this should not be a replacement > for joins" I do not think he was against this being a feature, only > being used in replacement of joins and nobody is suggesting that. > > the moment the field type is 'list:integer' the input and output for > this field should be a list of integers. If this field actually > contains ids than if whould be of type 'list:reference <tablename>' > > On Sep 7, 12:08 pm, Richard Vézina <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Ok... It just because it was contested by Thadeus Burgess when you lunch > it > > :http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.web2py/39762 > > > > An other thing I don't get it to work, is on crud.read... I just have my > id > > with no more "|" separator (|id1|id2| = now id1 id2 on crud.read). How > may I > > have my format representation or specified my representation rule with > > .represent=... > > > > Richard > > > > 2010/9/7 mdipierro <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > On Sep 7, 11:39 am, Richard Vézina <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > It solve the problem on update... > > > > > > I was wondering if list:integer, list:string and list:reference were > > > there > > > > to stay?? > > > > > yes they are here to stay. > > > > > > Is that having to change the type of my field is an ascendent > > > compatibility > > > > problem?? > > > > > This is a backward compatibility issue. I will try fix it. Even if > > > fixed it is much better to properly label the fields as "list:integer" > > > instead of a string. You get many added bonus features. > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > Richard > > > > > > 2010/9/7 mdipierro <[email protected]> > > > > > > > What is the field that has the multiple validator? If it is of type > > > > > 'string', can you try change the type to 'list:integer'? > > > > > > > On Sep 7, 10:35 am, Richard Vézina <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello Massimo, > > > > > > > > This problem looks the same as mine!! > > > > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > 2010/9/7 vince <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > after upgraded to 1.83.2, sqlform of is_in_db multiple no > longer > > > > > > > highlight the previous selected items from db. >
