2010/10/16 mdipierro <[email protected]>:
> Do you mean client-side events or server-side events, or something in
> between?
client side events calling listeners on the server.
For instance we have a button. Having an interface to add listeners
and managing ajax responses
would allow writing similar code in a controller:
def ajaxButton(): # may use it with a/c/ajaxButton.load
b=BUTTON('PUSH ME!')
b.addListener(lambda ajaxresponse:
ajaxresponse.appendJS('jQuery(%s).hide();' % b.id)
the above is just a stupid example, I hope it is not too confusing...
I'd create a standard Json response encapsulating the payload of js,
page headers, and a list of maps of the tipe {id: <element id>,
{html: <replacement>, onreadyjs: <javascript on element ready>}}. A
javascript function (on the client) would take care of reading the
Json response and take appropriate actions.
>
> I think while we lack server-side events we actually have a system for
> handling client side events using jQuery and LOAD. I will post an
> example. I need to resume and fix this:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_thread/thread/9c7ac0bfa7f6fe7/2f972fa13ed0f1a0?lnk=gst&q=jdiv#2f972fa13ed0f1a0
>
> the jDiv class was the grandfather of the LOAD helper.
>
> On Oct 15, 3:10 pm, Michele Comitini <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> Lately I have been "forced" to use wicket (wicket.apache.org).
>> Wicket is by no means "agile" compared to web2py. Wicket is not a
>> full stack framework it needs a lot of other things to serve pages.
>> As with any java coding wicket takes ages and pages to do things
>> that python does in one line. Against there is the java language which
>> is not functional and you need to carry around full objects (in wicket
>> called models) to pass messages between components, which can be long
>> to write.
>>
>> But the thing I would take from wicket is a strong component/event
>> oriented approach with well defined interfaces, and a lot of
>> predefined widgets.
>>
>> The same componet/event architecture can be implemented in web2py
>> using pyjamas, and it is quite easy and much more flexible, but it
>> would be nice to have it included by default or as a plugin!
>>
>> 2010/10/15 David Marko <[email protected]>:
>>
>> > My favourite for clean java ishttp://www.playframework.org/Better
>> > experience than with Grails.
>>
>> > David
>>
>> > On 15 říj, 02:21, Bruno Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> Grails uses a template language
>>
>> >> <g:each in="${books}">
>>
>> >> You can't write Java or Groove in views as we can do with web2py writing
>> >> pure Python direclty in views.
>> >> It is one of the best/important feature in web2py, lot of people love
>> >> web2py
>> >> because of the template system.
>>
>> >> 2010/10/14 Jonathan Lundell <[email protected]>
>>
>> >> > On Oct 14, 2010, at 4:38 PM, DJ wrote:
>>
>> >> > I was in a discussion recently telling my friend how great Web2Py was
>> >> > for programmer productivity with all the inbuilt features (server,
>> >> > CRUD, auth). We were wondering if there was anything similar in Java?
>> >> > Quick google search brought me to Tapestry and Wicket.
>>
>> >> > Can any of you comment on any frameworks in java you have worked with
>> >> > that resemble Web2py? Thank you for your comments.
>>
>> >> > One possibility is Groovy, essentially a dynamic version of Java, and
>> >> > the
>> >> > Grails framework.
>>
>> >> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groovy_(programming_language)<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groovy_%28programming_language%29>
>> >> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grails_(framework)<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grails_%28framework%29>
>>
>> >> > *Java is the new COBOL*
>>
>> >> --
>>
>> >>http://rochacbruno.com.br
>>
>>
