On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:53 PM, VP <[email protected]> wrote: > The other way is more natural because controller's "arguments" > correspond exactly to functions' arguments in Python. It's > conceptually better. Now, controller functions have no, in fact > cannot have, arguments. This I think is strange.
If you've followed this thread carefully, you'd have noticed your obvious error. Check the posts and you'll find instructions on how to modify your routes so you can have controller functions with arguments. It's not automatic, and Massimo suggested that he might automate this in future, but the solution he posted is as good as any other out there. -- Branko Vukelić [email protected] [email protected] Check out my blog: http://www.brankovukelic.com/ Check out my portfolio: http://www.flickr.com/photos/foxbunny/ Registered Linux user #438078 (http://counter.li.org/) I hang out on identi.ca: http://identi.ca/foxbunny Gimp Brushmakers Guild http://bit.ly/gbg-group
