not that I don't trust webfaction setup scripts, but there are a few
shortcomings in passing along the auth headers .... fcgi to say one
needs an extra parameter.
I forgot that maybe it will be easier to set up a page ....
def test():
heads = [("- %s: %s" %(k,v)) for k,v in request.env.iteritems() if
k.startswith('http_')]
return ('\n').join(heads)
and try to retrieve the page with urllib.urlopen with user and pass
and see the output.
Niphlod
On Oct 29, 1:00 am, Niphlod <[email protected]> wrote:
> how are you passing along requests from apache to web2py ?
> can you monitor if web2py actually receive all the headers you send ?
>
> something like
>
> def test():
> with os.open("path/to/file", 'wb') as g:
> for k,v in request.env.iteritems():
> if k.startswith('http_'):
> g.write("%s: %s" % (k,v))
>
> in your controller should be enough. try to call app/controller/test
> with username and password and go to see the log...
>
> On Oct 28, 5:47 pm, "david.waldrop" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I am very confused. I have a simple service 'getmeetings' which is
> > decorated as XMLRPC. The call also requires authorization and basic
> > authorization is enabled in db.py. Here is what happens
>
> > 1) When run locally on my dev machine - everything works, if i
> > sent in valid id and pw i get results AND if i send in invalid
> > password i get a 303 indicating no aurthorization.
>
> > 2) When i run on the production machine (linux+apache) - i always
> > get 303 even when sending in valid ID and pw. If i remove the auth-
> > required decorator the service gets invoked.
>
> > I think this implies a problem with the authorization, possibly due to
> > some environmental setting. I am stuck and unable to figure this
> > out. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
>
> > here is the original
> > post:http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_thread/thread/fea1decf09...
>
>
