Yes, agreed , that may have been a little too strong of an opinion, in fact, WAS too strong, so I'll take that back since the intention was not to offend, so apologies for that one. I'll say instead: I think P4 is much better suited when comes time to integrate to processes/ automation such QA automation, but again, that's just my opinion based on my own experience.
Mart :) On Oct 30, 8:17 pm, Jonathan Lundell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 30, 2010, at 4:24 PM, mart wrote: > > > > > Last point, and I know I am persistently annoying with this, but > > mercurial, IMHO, sucks, sucks a lot. Personally I would use nothing > > less then the best out there, Perforce, specially if considering > > automated testing (again IMHO, but at least a fairly well supported > > statement :)). > > Not digress too far, but as a long-time Perforce user, I'm pretty much > committed (!) to using hg for my future projects. If we were discussing p4 vs > svn, I'd agree, but I confess to being a little baffled by the "hg sucks a > lot" assertion.
