> I did not really look in detail to comment on the technical merits but > I do find their MV argument (Pyramid is not MVC but MV very > confusing).
Yeah, they say, "The concepts of view and model are used by pyramid mostly as they would be by Django". So, I guess their V is more like our C (and according to Django, the framework itself is the real "controller" -- see http://ru.ly/mH). Pyramid has templates but claims "templates are really just an implementation detail of any given view" (http://ru.ly/hu), so not really a separate application layer. So, web2py = MVC, Django = MTV, and Pyramid = M(T+V)? Anthony p.s., Note the use of ru.ly, a web2py powered app.
