Hi Thadeus, I'm not doing any checking with "check_reserved" (http://web2py.com/ book/default/chapter/06?search=reserved#Reserved-Keywords), if that's what you're asking.
I really did not fully understand that section, does it only check whether the current table and field names are in conflict or not?. I would still have to change the conflicting names, wouldn't I?. Thanks, Carlos On Dec 12, 5:55 pm, Thadeus Burgess <[email protected]> wrote: > Are you using the reserved_keywords check built into the DAL? > > -- > Thadeus > > > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Carlos <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Massimo, > > > Thanks for clarifying this. > > > Carlos > > > On Dec 11, 7:41 pm, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote: > > > No. Right now there may problems if you used a reserved keyword. > > > > On Dec 11, 6:57 pm, Carlos <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > With respect to the following old thread: > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_thread/thread/6a0948e7bf. > > .. > > > > > Is web2py now ready to use reserved words as table and field names > > > > (e.g. "user", "group") without any conflicts with any of the supported > > > > databases?. > > > > > Or what should be done in order to be "portable" across multiple > > > > databases?. > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Carlos
