On Sunday, December 12, 2010 7:21:52 PM UTC+1, mdipierro wrote: > > I think we should close this discussion. It is not going anywhere. The > license of web2py is not up for discussion. I say (and said) that the GPL > license applies to derivative work only. Applications built with web2py and > distributed with web2py (compiled or not) are not derivative work therefore > the license does not apply. My statement has a legal validity because I have > complete copyright on web2py. Having as many users as possible is not a > goal. The goal is to have the best web2py framework and not fragment the > community. The GPL license, in my view, helps to keep the community > together.
+1 Just a latest question: There are some files in gluon/contrib directory don't have a license header , some others have a mit license, so there is a little mess in this files that are distributed with web2py. Also, is there any reason to stay in gpl v2 instead of moving to v3? Regards. José L.
