You got me in the right direction. Txs. I'll be starting a separate thread on what I'm trying to achieve, so far without success.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Niphlod <[email protected]> wrote: > sorry, my mistake! > > On Jan 29, 4:01 pm, Miguel Lopes <[email protected]> wrote: >> gluons/tools.py >> >> Txs, >> Miguel >> >> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Niphlod <[email protected]> wrote: >> > call_or_redirect() is the real "addition" here .... you can use both a >> > URL or a function to manage on_failed_authentication and >> > on_failed_authorization ... take a look in gluon/utils.py >> >> > On Jan 28, 1:48 am, miguel <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > I suppose this is mentioned in the Change Log by: >> > > "on_failed_authorization can be a function, thanks Niphold" >> >> > > How is this used? could the function be a lambda, does it take params, >> > > is it an action (i.e. a controller function)? >> >> > > Also, is it possible to allow the usual login redirection in case it >> > > is not a service call? I'm thinking in these lines: >> >> > > def theFunction(): >> > > if request.function == 'call': >> > > # return case forservice call >> > > else: >> > > # redirect to login form >> >> > > This would be useful for publishing the same service both for browsers >> > > and for other apps, like it is mentioned in p:// >> >www.web2pyslices.com/main/slices/take_slice/48 >> > > (see "Authentication"). This solution would also be useful for other >> > > non-browser-based clients. Would it work? How is the function used? >> >> > > Txs, >> > > Miguel >> >> > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> > > From: mdipierro <[email protected]> >> > > Date: Sep 23 2010, 2:34 pm >> > > Subject: web2py basic auth >> > > To: web2py-users >> >> > > Against trunk please. It is ok if you just send me a replacement file. >> > > I will diff and study it. >> >> > > On Sep 23, 8:52 am, Niphlod <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > > Never done a patch before, but I think in the night (here are 3PM) I >> > > > can manage to have a first draft. >> >> > > > I'd have to test it out, but for the beginning .. What wuold be the >> > > > patch against ? tools.py in trunk or tools.py in 1.85.3? >> >> > > > On 23 Set, 14:52, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > > > You are right. That would be best. Want to send me a patch? >> >> > > > > On Sep 23, 2:26 am, Niphlod <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>
