Actually thinking about this a bit more, mssql should be used for MSSQL 2000, and mssql2005 instead of mssql2, and mssql3. The mssql will be compatible with 2000, 2005, and 2008, while mssql2005 will be compatible with 2005, 2008, and up. What do you think about that?
On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > Let's create a mssql3 that does it by the book (or do you think MS > will keep changing the API?) > > On Mar 2, 9:11 am, Ross Peoples <[email protected]> wrote: >> The only I problem I see is that MSSQL 2000 will not understand >> varchar(max). For reference, there is a StackOverflow question that relates >> to >> this:http://stackoverflow.com/questions/737755/varcharmax-ms-sql-server-20...
