On Friday, April 8, 2011 3:01:31 PM UTC-4, guruyaya wrote: > > I don't like this option, because I'll have to make sure I have only > one of this group manually. I thought of a validator that will do the > job for me, but it got very complicted. > I acctually had an idea of using IS_IN_DB, but leave the field as an > integer, instead of a reference.
Yes, that was Massimo's suggestion a previous time this came up: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/web2py/vXETf06TfwI/-IhhyaO93AoJ
