On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 12:44:26 PM UTC-4, VP wrote: > > What I have issues with (perhaps wrongly) is the complication in > distinguishing migrate and fake_migrate. I'm not talking about where > it is used (in DAL(...) or in define_tables(...)). > > I think there's a logical thing in terminology that might needs to > straighten up, whenever appropriate.
I suppose you could call it something like rebuild_metadata, but we'd still need to keep fake_migrate for backward compatibility.
