On Apr 29, 2011, at 4:42 AM, Martín Mulone wrote: > http://bit.ly/kYC5Pw
Did you test that? I think it should be the other way around--that is, that applications=None disabled application-name removal from the URL. > > 2011/4/27 Jonathan Lundell <[email protected]> > On Apr 27, 2011, at 2:40 PM, pbreit wrote: > > But I think he wants his app to be the default and still have it show in > > the URL? > > With the parametric (new) router, you can do that by specifying: > applications=None in the base router.
