it's a good idea, pardon me, my point of view is focus on the performance because the data will growth and the database process will be high. i think it'll be so hard to maintain if the performance is degraded and the application system had already live.
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 9:03 PM, villas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 30, 2:14 pm, Stifan Kristi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > how about the performance difference between using single database or > > multiple database? did you consider about it? > > I don't think that's an issue for me because DBs have to be really > big, or large numbers of transactions before speed becomes a > problem. > > Furthermore, the model I have in mind is also inherently scalable > because I can easily replicate the setup across different servers. > e.g. sub-domains A-M routed to DBserver1 and N-Z routed to DBserver2 > etc. > > There will also be the option to move to GoogleSQL in future.
