You are my man! I miss disabled...
Thanks Anthony. Richard On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, May 3, 2011 4:16:59 PM UTC-4, Richard wrote: >> >> You miss read... I know that. >> >> My problem is that when I update my user status I have no switch except >> build my own to not update the status of user that should stay blocked. >> >> I mean when I go for maintenance I put everybody to blocked but then when >> I want to bring back access to user I put all the blocked to nothing so they >> get access again... But the one who should stay blocked I have to check >> (remember) and manually set them back to blocked... I could build a lookup >> table to know which should stay blocked but a new key word (for example >> "blocked_permanent") appear to me what I am searching for. >> > > The book says you can use either "blocked" or "disabled" -- so why don't > you use "disabled" for those who are only temporarily blocked, and use > "blocked" for those who are permanently blocked? Note, you can also create a > custom auth_user table and simply add a column to track those who are > permanently blocked. > > Anthony >
