Good catch, thank you. Fixed. (and yes, this is the place to report such things)
On May 11, 3:27 am, Manuele Pesenti <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > at this > linkhttp://www.web2py.com/book/default/chapter/07#Validators-with-Depende... > > is still reported a wrong example that uses a not existent validator > IS_SAME_AS instead of IS_EQUAL_TO > > is it the right place to report this kind of stuff? > > Thanks > Manuele
