Yes, it seems to be faster too, but somehow not so simple to read - prob the rich text, yuk!
On Jun 8, 11:12 pm, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday, June 8, 2011 4:47:15 PM UTC-4, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > > old one. perhaps that is the problem. > > The new interface has its quirks/bugs, but for the most part seems to work > well. The nice thing is that it enables rich text messages, and you can > attach files (in the old interface, you could only attach files by sending > an email with an attachment). > > Anthony
