I assume it was designed not to call BEAUTIFY with a single item so you could use generic.html to display a "real" page (i.e., not just for development). BEAUTIFY isn't ideal for that because it displays the key for each item in _vars to the left of the rendered objects. Maybe it could test to see if the object is a string or has an xml() method, and not call BEAUTIFY in that case. And/or call BEAUTIFY with response._vars.values(), so the _vars key won't get displayed (maybe even do this when multiple items are in response._vars). Maybe there are other options... Anthony
On Thursday, June 23, 2011 9:05:00 PM UTC-4, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > I do not oppose to the change. Anybody else pros or cons? > > Massimo > > On Jun 23, 7:10 pm, pbreit <[email protected]> wrote: > > Why doesn't generic.html beautify when len(vars)==1? When I send in one > > record, I'd like it to display beautified. > > > > {{if len(response._vars)==1:}} > > {{=response._vars.values()[0]}} > > {{elif len(response._vars)>1:}} > > {{=BEAUTIFY(response._vars)}} > > {{pass}}
