On Jul 23, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Ross Peoples wrote: > I had given that some thought, but went with '.mobile.html' for clarity. I > suppose I could make it just '.m.html', but that might be hard to see in a > list of files. I could have just made it '.mobile', or something, but then > code editors won't pick up on it. It's actually kind of annoying manually > telling code editors which syntax highlighting to use all the time. If you > use '.load' extensions a lot, then you know what I'm talking about.
I agree that .html is desirable. .m.html would be an improvement; people are (to some extent) already trained to know what that means because of how some sites (Google comes to mind) use 'm' as a mobile subdomain: m.google.com. But what I'm asking is how the name gets used, and whether it couldn't be a flag in the session (say) or something else less visible.
