Actually more Modularizing inside Gluon should be made easy. putting all core features into gluon/core , everything that related into gluon/dal , those can be removed without problem into its own folders etc.
I will look into this first. On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Phyo Arkar <phyo.arkarl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Plus Bandwidth concern. I use my own Dedicated and VPS servers to host. >> They are already busy , and Bigger file-size = more bandwidth , 10MB * >> Download already 10 GB . If this become popular , bandwidth cost will be >> great.. >> > > > Errata: > > 10MB * 1000 Downloads already 10GB. My bandwidth limit is 80 GB amonth. > > > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:55 AM, Phyo Arkar <phyo.arkarl...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Syst admin like make system hardening... >>> >>> That could be an answer... >>> >> >> Yes i am more into "Sys Admin" than web-developer , you've read my mind >> Richard >> Vézina >> >> >> Ok my concern is not really about the File size but the Code Base size >> (lines of code , number of features). >> >> Here is what i have: >> >> 1 . Its best to keep as light ( codebase wise ) as possible . >> 2 . When you know features in this module is not going to be use , you >> should be able to remove it. >> 3 . Smaller codebase == Easier to debug >> 4 . Easier to Debug == Easier to Modify == More incentives for >> Contributions >> 5 . Sys admins hates Bloat-ness (even tho we are FAT :P ) >> 6 . Security , easier to control when unwanted modules can be removed. >> >> >> I also still care about file-size too : >> >> 14 MB is small for "you" Dosen't mean thats small for other part of of >> the world. Here connection speed is Averaged to 64 kbit/s to 256kbit/s and >> random (Frequent) disconnects , people believes 1 MB is already big. zipped >> web2py is already 6.9MB. >> >> Plus Bandwidth concern. I use my own Dedicated and VPS servers to host. >> They are already busy , and Bigger file-size = more bandwidth , 10MB * >> Download already 10 GB . If this become popular , bandwidth cost will be >> great.. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:04 PM, cjrh <caleb.hatti...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wednesday, 3 August 2011 16:22:46 UTC+2, mcm wrote: >>>> >>>> I agree, that size is small even on "embedded" systems by now... >>>> Anyway trying to keep it small is always a good thing IMHO. >>> >>> >>> I think the word "small" is the wrong word to use here. It doesn't >>> really mean anything. It is a relative word that only has meaning in >>> comparison to something else. If there are files within web2py that are >>> not used, then they should be removed regardless of the effect on size. I >>> think the OP was saying or suggesting that it should be possible to remove >>> files that are not needed on a per-installation basis. But my follow-up >>> question to that would be why? Sheer size doesn't seem to be a >>> compelling-enough reason by itself. >>> >>>> >> >
